Notes (and a doodle) on the Sphere

Students all over Europe, in universities, monastery schools and other institutions of learning, learned astronomy from Sacrobosco’s Sphere. Many of them took notes on the text and the lectures on the text that they attended. In a precious few cases, these notes have survived into the 21st century.

In the mid-17th-century a student named Gilles Rigaulx attended a set of lectures on Aristotelian philosophy in Valkenberg, a town in the southern Dutch province of Limburg, close to Maastricht. His notebook is preserved in the Wellcome Library in London. It contains notes on the following works of Aristotle: Physics, Metaphysics, On the heavens, On generation and corruption, Meteorology, and On the soul. Sandwiched between his notes on the Metaphysics and On the heavens, is Rigaulx’s summary of the Sphere. Rigaulx’s notes demonstrate that Sacrobosco’s Sphere was still being taught well into the 17th century, as was Aristotelian natural philosophy.

Rigaulx begins by stating that the four mathematical subjects are “Arithmetic, Geometry, Astrology and Music.” His notes follow the organization of Sacrobosco’s Sphere closely. He begins with definitions of a sphere. He describes the major circles that divide the spherical cosmos – the ecliptic (or equinoctial), the zodiac, the colures – and the minor circles – the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn and the Arctic and Antarctic Circles. He doesn’t include any of the diagrams or pictures that were commonly included in editions of Sacrobosco’s Sphere, so I’ve added the following annotated illustration of these circles from Joannes Regiomontanus, Epitome of Ptolemy’s Almagest (1496), for those unfamiliar with the terms.

Epytoma Ioa[n]nis de Mo[n]te Regio in Almagestu[m] Ptolomei. Venice, Johannes Hamman, 31 Aug. (pridie Kal. Sept.) 1496. Digital edition from Library of Congress. My annotations.

Rigaulx explains the climactic zones on earth – torrid, frigid and temperate – as well as the ways the lengths of day and night vary throughout the year and in different parts of the earth. He finishes with a description of epicycles and eccentrics.

My favorite part of Rigaulx’s notes is the sketch of a man with an exaggeratedly large nose and chin, standing with his hands on his hips. This charming figure is on the page immediately before the notes on the Sphere start. I haven’t been able to find out who Gilles Rigaulx was, or what he did after his education in Aristotelian philosophy. I have no idea who the man in the doodle is, or if it is even supposed to represent a real person. But I love the reminder that students always have interests and lives outside of their academic studies

Further reading

Heinrich Kuhn, Aristotelianism in the Renaissance The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
close-alt close collapse comment ellipsis expand gallery heart lock menu next pinned previous reply search share star